Dr. Paul, I presume
Please enjoy this tidbit from Andrew Cusack.
I thought Karl might enjoy the comments, and might have some mathematical/statistical insight.
Posted: July 26th, 2007 under National Interest.
Comments: 1
Comments
Comment from Karl
Time: 27 July 2007, 11:27 am
Not too sure about any mathematical or statistical insight. It seems to me that the commenter who raised the question about the number of donors makes a valid point. If I were a candidate, I\’d like to have a large number of potential voters writing small checks rather than a few potential voters that write large checks. After all, in the end, each individual vote counts, not the treasury of the candidate. Of course, I wouldn\’t object too strongly to voters writing large checks either.
It remains to be seen whether this means much of anything for Ron Paul. Remember, last election\’s wunder-fund-raiser was Howard Dean, and I believe he finished well back in the pack. I can only hope that funding is not the determining factor as that will leave me with the choice of Paul or McCain. I might have to write in Buchanan again if that\’s the case.
Write a comment